Rm H3580 MC 5640
Stanford, CA 94305
University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, 2001
UCSF Pediatric Fellowships, San Francisco, CA, 2002
Stanford University Anesthesiology Residency, Stanford, CA, 2008
UCSF Pediatric Fellowships, San Francisco, CA, 2004
Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 2009
Anesthesia, American Board of Anesthesiology
Pediatric Anesthesia, American Board of Anesthesiology
View details for DOI 10.1053/j.jvca.2009.05.006
View details for Web of Science ID 000278288500017
View details for PubMedID 19632857
In anesthesia and critical care, invasive arterial blood pressure monitoring is the gold standard against which other methods of monitoring are compared. In this assessment of the Philips MP90 monitor, the objective was to determine whether or not oscillometric measurements were within the accuracy standards set by the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI) and the British Hypertension Society (BHS). Three hundred and one invasive and noninvasive paired measurements were obtained from eleven adult patients on the neurosurgical service at Stanford University Medical Center. Bland-Altman plots were created to assess agreement between the two measurement systems. Paired correlation analysis, bias and precision calculations were performed. Oscillometric blood pressure measurements correlated with arterial measurements yielding Pearson r values of 0.68, 0.67 and 0.62 for systolic, diastolic and mean pressures, respectively (P < 0.01.) Mean differences with 95% confidence intervals were -3.8 mmHg +/- 13.6, -2.4 mmHg +/- 10.0, and 4.0 mmHg +/- 13.1 for systolic, diastolic and mean pressures, respectively. The mean difference for these measurements was View details for DOI 10.1007/s10877-009-9178-8 View details for PubMedID 19396553
View details for DOI 10.1213/01.ane.0000249841
View details for Web of Science ID 000243040100085
View details for PubMedID 17179300